[Bug 111409] New: [CI][SHARDS]igt at i915_pm_rps@* - fail - Failed assertion: freqs[MAX] <= freqs[CUR]|Failed assertion: boost_freqs[CUR] == boost_freqs[BOOST]

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111409

            Bug ID: 111409
           Summary: [CI][SHARDS]igt at i915_pm_rps@* - fail - Failed
                    assertion: freqs[MAX] <= freqs[CUR]|Failed assertion:
                    boost_freqs[CUR] == boost_freqs[BOOST]
           Product: DRI
           Version: DRI git
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: DRM/Intel
          Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: lakshminarayana.vudum at intel.com
        QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
                CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6706/shard-iclb2/igt@i915_pm_rps@min-max-config-loaded.html
Starting subtest: min-max-config-loaded
(i915_pm_rps:2348) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function loaded_check, file
../tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c:503:
(i915_pm_rps:2348) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: freqs[MAX] <= freqs[CUR]
(i915_pm_rps:2348) CRITICAL: Last errno: 2, No such file or directory
(i915_pm_rps:2348) CRITICAL: error: 1050 > 1017
Subtest min-max-config-loaded failed.

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6650/shard-iclb1/igt@i915_pm_rps@reset.html
Starting subtest: reset
(i915_pm_rps:1153) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function waitboost, file
../tests/i915/i915_pm_rps.c:607:
(i915_pm_rps:1153) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: boost_freqs[CUR] ==
boost_freqs[BOOST]
(i915_pm_rps:1153) CRITICAL: error: 450 != 1050
Subtest reset failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20190816/3c44ef5b/attachment.html>