[Bug 109472] [CI][DRMTIP] igt at gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-none - fail - Test assertion failure function compare_regs- Failed assertion: num_errors == 0
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Mon Jan 28 10:56:01 UTC 2019
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109472
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
commit 478452fece3997dfacaa4d6babe6b8bf6fef784f
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon Jan 7 12:35:27 2019 +0000
i915/gem_ctx_isolation: Ignore the low bits of BB_OFFSET
On Skylake, BB_OFFSET seems to be unstable. Since this is an
offset into the batch at the time of CS execution, it should be actively
written to as we read from the register so allow it a qword of
discrepancy (since the CS should be reading in qwords). This still
allows us to detect dirt across the rest of the register field, should
that be required.
v2: restrict ignore_bits to only BIT(2) that we see fluctuate in testing
(Antonio)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano at intel.com>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20190128/85fa1228/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list