[Bug 109661] [CI][SHARDS] igt at gem_eio@unwedge-stress - fail - Failed assertion: med < limit && max < 5 * limit

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109661

Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #6 from Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> ---
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #5)
> Now that's just cruel, having supplied a patch specifically for the
> unwedge-stress subtest, you cross-pollute it with reset-stress!
> 
> Not that it'll make much difference, but there is quite a difference in
> driver paths between the two subtests.

Sorry about that! However, unwedge-stress is still failing:
 -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4855/shard-snb5/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
 -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_4858/shard-snb4/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
 -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5671/shard-snb4/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html
 -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5672/shard-snb2/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html


If the fix for these issues is not fixing the reset-stress issues, we'll create
a new bug!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20190306/4ed52487/attachment.html>