[Bug 109014] [CI][DRMTIP] igt at gem_eio@in-flight-* - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf_wr(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -5 != 0

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Mar 8 14:17:48 UTC 2019


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109014

Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #3 from Martin Peres <martin.peres at free.fr> ---
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #2)
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Wed Jan 30 13:09:59 2019 +0000
> 
>     i915/gem_eio: 64 batches may be too many for some devices!
>     
>     Actually measure how many batches we can fit into a ring before
>     blocking, or else we may end up hanging the device earlier than
>     expected!
>     
>     v2: Mostly conservative.
>     
>     Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109014
>     Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>     Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>

No failures since the patch, when it used to be seen every run (except for ~10
runs for some reason). Anyway, not seen for over 30 runs now. Closing!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20190308/6c96522d/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list