[Bug 112065] [CI][BAT] igt at i915_selftest@live_execlists - incomplete - GEM_BUG_ON(execlists_active(&engine->execlists) != rq)
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Thu Nov 7 08:27:35 UTC 2019
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112065
Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum at intel.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from Lakshmi <lakshminarayana.vudum at intel.com> ---
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #10)
> commit 13ed13a4dcbf0b664acbf9e6f98ec7851cc59862 (HEAD ->
> drm-intel-next-queued, drm-intel/drm-intel-next-queued)
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date: Mon Oct 21 09:02:11 2019 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Don't set queue_priority_hint if we don't kick the submission
>
> If we change the priority of the active context, then it has no impact
> on the decision of whether to preempt the active context -- we don't
> preempt the context with itself. In this situation, we elide the tasklet
> rescheduling and should *not* be marking up the queue_priority_hint as
> that may mask a later submission where we decide we don't have to kick
> the tasklet as a higher priority submission is pending (spoiler alert,
> it was not).
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> Link:
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191021080226.537-1-
> chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thanks. Until this fix, the reproduction rate was 100%. Last seen CI_DRM_7137
(2 weeks, 3 days old), closing and archiving this issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20191107/d0446186/attachment.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list