[Bug 111873] New: [CI][SHARDS]Failed assertion: (double)(100.0 * busy_r) <= ((double)(100.0 * expected) + (2)) && (double)(100.0 * busy_r) >= ((double)(100.0 * expected) - (2))

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111873

            Bug ID: 111873
           Summary: [CI][SHARDS]Failed assertion: (double)(100.0 * busy_r)
                    <= ((double)(100.0 * expected) + (2)) &&
                    (double)(100.0 * busy_r) >= ((double)(100.0 *
                    expected) - (2))
           Product: DRI
           Version: DRI git
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: not set
          Priority: not set
         Component: DRM/Intel
          Assignee: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: lakshminarayana.vudum at intel.com
        QA Contact: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org
                CC: intel-gfx-bugs at lists.freedesktop.org

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6979/shard-tglb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-98-vcs1.html
Starting subtest: busy-accuracy-98-vcs1
(perf_pmu:1592) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function accuracy, file
../tests/perf_pmu.c:1762:
(perf_pmu:1592) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: (double)(100.0 * busy_r) <=
((double)(100.0 * expected) + (2)) && (double)(100.0 * busy_r) >=
((double)(100.0 * expected) - (2))
(perf_pmu:1592) CRITICAL: 98.060145 not within +2.000000/-2.000000 of
95.940253! ('100.0 * busy_r' vs '100.0 * expected')
Subtest busy-accuracy-98-vcs1 failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20191001/99f3e6ca/attachment-0001.html>