[Bug 111895] [CI][BAT] igt at i915_selftest@live_execlists/live_unlite_switch - dmesg-fail: timed out, cancelling all further testing
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Fri Oct 4 16:08:07 UTC 2019
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111895
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #6 from Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> ---
Hopefully it is the problem I was aiming for in the test...
commit 2935ed5339c495066d901b97de384d86c55a3f6d
Author: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri Oct 4 14:40:08 2019 +0100
drm/i915: Remove logical HW ID
With the introduction of ctx->engines[] we allow multiple logical
contexts to be used on the same engine (e.g. with virtual engines).
According to bspec, aach logical context requires a unique tag in order
for context-switching to occur correctly between them. [Simple
experiments show that it is not so easy to trick the HW into performing
a lite-restore with matching logical IDs, though my memory from early
Broadwell experiments do suggest that it should be generating
lite-restores.]
We only need to keep a unique tag for the active lifetime of the
context, and for as long as we need to identify that context. The HW
uses the tag to determine if it should use a lite-restore (why not the
LRCA?) and passes the tag back for various status identifies. The only
status we need to track is for OA, so when using perf, we assign the
specific context a unique tag.
v2: Calculate required number of tags to fill ELSP.
Fixes: 976b55f0e1db ("drm/i915: Allow a context to define its set of
engines
")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111895
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Link:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20191004/496088f8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the intel-gfx-bugs
mailing list