[Bug 112141] [CI][SHARDS]igt at gem_exec_balancer@full* - fail - Failed assertion: load > 0.90, minimum load for 1 x class:0 was found to be only 0.0% busy

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Sat Oct 26 20:56:43 UTC 2019


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112141

--- Comment #1 from CI Bug Log <cibuglog at gmail.com> ---
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* APL KBL GLK:  igt at gem_exec_balancer@full* - fail - Failed assertion: load
> 0.90, minimum load for 1 x class:0 was found to be only 0.0% busy
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3602/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-pulse.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7178/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7178/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7178/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7179/shard-apl6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7179/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7179/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7180/shard-apl4/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-pulse.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7180/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-pulse.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14977/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14977/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20191026/32e678c8/attachment.html>


More information about the intel-gfx-bugs mailing list