[Bug 111539] BSW: igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-* - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -22 != 0

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111539

--- Comment #1 from CI Bug Log <cibuglog at gmail.com> ---
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* BSW:  igt at gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-* - fail - Failed assertion:
__gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0, error: -22 != 0
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_355/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-active.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_355/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_355/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-active.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_355/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_356/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-active.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_356/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_356/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-active.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_356/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_357/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-active.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_357/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_357/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range-active.html
  -
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_357/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-range.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx-bugs/attachments/20190902/985c829c/attachment-0001.html>