<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [regression] scripted xrandr commands in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/ are disregarded"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94403#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - [regression] scripted xrandr commands in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/ are disregarded"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94403">bug 94403</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>The difference between the bad and good Xorg.log (looking at
xorg.0.log-iG41-big41-stw20160303-xrandr-1680x1050-bad096 and
xorg.0.log-iG41-big41-stw20160223-xrandr-1680x1050x108-OK) is whether or not
the xrandr command is received (or acted upon). Especially as --dpi handling is
not part of the -intel but core Xserver.

A quick test would be adding sleep 5 before the xrandr command. I think perhaps
strace'ing the whole startup (xinit + X + xrandr) would help identify the
issue.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>