<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [regression] scripted xrandr commands in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/ are disregarded"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94403#c1">Comment # 1</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [regression] scripted xrandr commands in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/ are disregarded"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94403">bug 94403</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>The difference between the bad and good Xorg.log (looking at
xorg.0.log-iG41-big41-stw20160303-xrandr-1680x1050-bad096 and
xorg.0.log-iG41-big41-stw20160223-xrandr-1680x1050x108-OK) is whether or not
the xrandr command is received (or acted upon). Especially as --dpi handling is
not part of the -intel but core Xserver.
A quick test would be adding sleep 5 before the xrandr command. I think perhaps
strace'ing the whole startup (xinit + X + xrandr) would help identify the
issue.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>