<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin 5"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94890#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling back to bit banging on pin 5"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94890">bug 94890</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com" title="Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Ville Syrjala</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to FadeMind from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=94890#c0">comment #0</a>)
<span class="quote">> Since lastest GIT releses of xf86-video-intel I have two warnings about
> GMBUS i915 dpb time out.
>
> [ 3.963578] [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpb] timed out, falling back to bit
> banging on pin 5
> [ 4.240243] [drm] GMBUS [i915 gmbus dpd] timed out, falling back to bit
> banging on pin 6</span >
That's actually perfectly normal, which means we shouldn't spam dmesg with it
needlessly. Some time ago I posted a patch to silence this:
<a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-March/089133.html">https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-March/089133.html</a>
Just need to get someone to review it.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>