<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [xf86-video-intel] Graphical corruption (regression between gc186d4d and gff0ab2c)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94928#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [xf86-video-intel] Graphical corruption (regression between gc186d4d and gff0ab2c)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94928">bug 94928</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:john.lindgren@aol.com" title="John Lindgren <john.lindgren@aol.com>"> <span class="fn">John Lindgren</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I suspect that d08221edabc5 did fix the "lost offset" problem introduced by
bb5194eebd72, at least in the non-SSE2 copy functions, but there is still a
problem in the SSE2 variants.
I am testing a patched version, which forces the use of
memcpy_to_tiled_x__swizzle_0
memcpy_from_tiled_x__swizzle_0
instead of
memcpy_to_tiled_x__swizzle_0__sse2
memcpy_from_tiled_x__swizzle_0__sse2
and I have not seen any artifacts so far.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>