<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [APL] [IGT Basic] igt / gem_exec_flush / basic-uc-r* fail"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95378#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [APL] [IGT Basic] igt / gem_exec_flush / basic-uc-r* fail"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95378">bug 95378</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Ok, so the extended soak tests only show the issue in the uc-before testcases.
The theory here is that the CPU is doing speculative prefetches from before the
call to execbuf/sync. (Or at least that is what this test was intended to
detect, and since none of the others fail, it seems reasonable to assume it is
this effect.)
So looks like nothing to see here, an expected failure.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>