<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [regression] The drm-intel-nightly branch no longer loads unversioned firmware" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96800#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [regression] The drm-intel-nightly branch no longer loads unversioned firmware" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96800">bug 96800</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com" title="Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>"> Rodrigo Vivi</a> <pre>Oh, now I see why that patch. However I don't believe it helps... It was never un-versioned anyways. I mean, How did you get the name i915/skl_dmc_ver1.bin in order to add this string name to the CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE in the first place? Note this also has a version in the string and if the new kernel was changing the abi and using the i915/skl_dmc_ver2.bin you would still face this issue here. Unfortunately I don't see a reliable solution here since we need to support firmware but be flexible giving people the opportunity to avoid it. I'm attempted to close this as wont-fix.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>