<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - intel-virtual-output: bad performance"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96820#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - intel-virtual-output: bad performance"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96820">bug 96820</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to main.haarp from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=96820#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> So, if I'm interpreting things correctly, it's mostly a problem of copying
> frames from the Nvidia X to Intel X, correct? What exactly is the
> bottleneck? CPU, memory bandwidth, PCIe bandwidth?</span >
Other way. The copy is from the intel screen to the nvidia screen. The Intel
half is fully accelerated, the nvidia portion is not. Ideally, we can eliminate
one of those copies by passing a buffer between instead.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>