<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - GCC memory starvation caused by flatten attribute with LTO" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77580#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - GCC memory starvation caused by flatten attribute with LTO" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77580">bug 77580</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:main.haarp@gmail.com" title="main.haarp@gmail.com">main.haarp@gmail.com</a> <pre>(In reply to Patrick McMunn from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=77580#c5">comment #5</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=125089" name="attach_125089" title="Patch to allow LTO optmization of xf86-video-intel">attachment 125089</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=125089&action=edit" title="Patch to allow LTO optmization of xf86-video-intel">[details]</a> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=77580&attachment=125089'>[review]</a> [review] > Patch to allow LTO optmization of xf86-video-intel > Nice work! This allows building with LTO on gcc-4.9. gcc-5.3.0 however fails to build it, throwing a bunch of these around: /usr/include/bits/string3.h:50:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline ‘memcpy’: target specific option mismatch Also, unlike your P4, I cannot detect any measurable performance improvements (Intel Sandy Bridge). Unfortunate. All tests done with xf86-video-intel from today's git.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>