<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [i915] Feature request: Add support for fencing for PRIME setups" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95472#c60">Comment # 60</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [i915] Feature request: Add support for fencing for PRIME setups" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95472">bug 95472</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:michel@daenzer.net" title="Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>"> Michel Dänzer</a> <pre>(In reply to Mario Kleiner from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=95472#c54">comment #54</a>) > Given that intel-kms with pageflipping seems to wait just fine on the dmabuf > fence for both old AMD radeon-kms + r600 and for different NVidia's under > nouveau, but it goes wrong with Tonga on amdgpu + radeonsi, it looks as if > something is missing in amdgpu-kms or radeonsi? I doubt it, since (I just double-checked again) it works correctly with the renderer using amdgpu and Xorg using radeon. We had similar issues within amdgpu before 1ffd26524380 ("drm/amdgpu: fix waiting for all fences before flipping"). Maybe i915 can learn something from that? Then again, radeon still seems to only consider the exclusive fence.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>