<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com" title="Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Joonas Lahtinen</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - [BAT] [SKL] System boots with [drm:i915_stolen_to_physical] *ERROR* conflict detected with stolen region: [0xc6000000 - 0xc8000000] on dmesg"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97621">bug 97621</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>NOTOURBUG
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - [BAT] [SKL] System boots with [drm:i915_stolen_to_physical] *ERROR* conflict detected with stolen region: [0xc6000000 - 0xc8000000] on dmesg"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97621#c13">Comment # 13</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - [BAT] [SKL] System boots with [drm:i915_stolen_to_physical] *ERROR* conflict detected with stolen region: [0xc6000000 - 0xc8000000] on dmesg"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97621">bug 97621</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com" title="Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Joonas Lahtinen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Thanks to Tomi for using DediProg to flash older bios for the dmesg and
/proc/iomem dumps. They are on exactly the same kernel and machine.
There's no difference between 1805 and 2002, which brings us to the conclusion
that OEM updated the memory mapping between 0704 and 1805 and since then there
is a BIOS reservation from PNP 00:07 conflicting with stolen memory area;
$ cat /sys/bus/pnp/devices/00\:07/firmware_node/path
\_SB_.PCI0.PDRC
PNP device 00:07 previously claims the same memory areas (with exact addresses
matching) in 0704 and the more recent ones, but there's that additional
reservation in iomem (c5400000-c7fffffe : pnp 00:07) which conflicts with
stolen.
I would classify this as UEFI vendor bug (could be our VBIOS too), because we
have no obvious way of correlating the reservation to stolen memory. The
claimed stolen memory resolution happens to be in the middle of the reservation
and no way aligned.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>