<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [ilk] Font and screen corruption in GTK+ applications" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88584#c32">Comment # 32</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [ilk] Font and screen corruption in GTK+ applications" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88584">bug 88584</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:a.sloman@cs.bham.ac.uk" title="Aaron Sloman <a.sloman@cs.bham.ac.uk>"> Aaron Sloman</a> <pre>(In reply to Mihail Kasadjikov from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=88584#c31">comment #31</a>) > I use "blt" instead of "uxa": Is there any reason "blt" would be preferable? I have searched a little but found no useful information. Many sites mention sna and uxa without mentioning blt. Some web sites suggest avoiding the intel driver and just using common xorg facilities, but I have not found any really clear information for someone with little knowledge. "uxa" has been working for me since I switched from "sna". Would I get any advantage from "blt"? Thanks</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>