<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:matthew.d.roper@intel.com" title="Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Matt Roper</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [regression 4.7] [BISECT]Low package c-states used only after forcing DPMS to off"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96645">bug 96645</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEEDINFO
</td>
<td>ASSIGNED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [regression 4.7] [BISECT]Low package c-states used only after forcing DPMS to off"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96645#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_ASSIGNED "
title="ASSIGNED - [regression 4.7] [BISECT]Low package c-states used only after forcing DPMS to off"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96645">bug 96645</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:matthew.d.roper@intel.com" title="Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Matt Roper</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Gabriele Mazzotta from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=96645#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> 4.10-rc3 is still affected. This is the newest version I tried.</span >
Thanks for confirming. I'll need to refresh my memory on this area of the
code, but my suspicion is that we're probably doing something wrong when we
inherit/sanitize the watermark values setup by the BIOS. Your DPMS off/on
workaround forces us to truly recalculate proper watermarks from scartch, and
presumably enter the deeper sleep states.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>