<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_CLOSED bz_closed"
title="CLOSED NOTABUG - applying rotate-90/270 transform properties fails with "Invalid argument" on Skylake"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98148#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_CLOSED bz_closed"
title="CLOSED NOTABUG - applying rotate-90/270 transform properties fails with "Invalid argument" on Skylake"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98148">bug 98148</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:carlosg@gnome.org" title="Carlos Garnacho Parro <carlosg@gnome.org>"> <span class="fn">Carlos Garnacho Parro</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I forgot about this bug... you're most probably right, mutter is not doing the
Y-tiling request for the affected framebuffers.
However mutter is just smart enough now to fallback to the same paths that
handle portrait rotation on gen<9, I filed
<a href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780141">https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780141</a> to handle the remaining bits
after the resolution of this bug. You're welcome to chime in there, since I'm
unclear how to tell gbm to enable y-tiling.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>