<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - HUC Firmware loading failure delays boot time by 60 seconds" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100240#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - HUC Firmware loading failure delays boot time by 60 seconds" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100240">bug 100240</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:michel.thierry@intel.com" title="Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>"> Michel Thierry</a> <pre>(In reply to Jani Nikula from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100240#c8">comment #8</a>) > (In reply to dog from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100240#c7">comment #7</a>) > > Lyncoln says this is likely a GuC FW issue since GuC loads HuC. > > If the scenario is i915 as built-in or as a module in initrd *and* there is > no firmware blob in initrd, it's not a GuC issue. It's up to debate whether > we should care about such a use case. This is the same case in Android (apologies if people was trying to omit the name); there we have to carry a must-rebase patch to delay the fw loading until first use. So I agree with Jani. It isn't something upstream should care about.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>