<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - [BAT][BSW] CI run hit a scheduler warning (rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100651#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTOURBUG - [BAT][BSW] CI run hit a scheduler warning (rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100651">bug 100651</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> Martin Peres</a> <pre>(In reply to Maarten Lankhorst from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100651#c2">comment #2</a>) > Seems to be a bug in the kernel, not i915.. > > <a href="https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9586351/">https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9586351/</a> Yes, it is. I filed it here because that's what we agreed on before, that we should file the bugs with i915 first since it impacts our testing, and then move it to the right owner. Of course, we never got to do that and I hope that we will soon have the man power to handle these bugs appropriately... Anyway, this is becoming funnier. The patch you mentioned made it to drm-tip but 2 days ago, we got this result: <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/CI_DRM_2590/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c.html">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/CI_DRM_2590/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c.html</a></pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>