<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BAT][BWR] MI_STORE_DWORD bogons"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101060#c15">Comment # 15</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BAT][BWR] MI_STORE_DWORD bogons"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101060">bug 101060</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101060#c14">comment #14</a>)
<span class="quote">> I've told igt to skip any test relying on MI_STORE_DWORD on Broadwater (and
> reduced the reliance where trivial). It does mean that we have a large gap
> in coverage on brw, but until we can get gem_exec_store passing, the results
> in BAT aren't helpful.</span >
Ah, that explains why we suddenly got all green or grey. I think this approach
makes sense, especially since we have a low priority for this platform. At
least, we'll catch additional regressions!
Let's keep this bug open then, but I will get rid of the blacklisting of tests
on BWR. If this becomes stable enough, we'll add the bwr machines to pre-merge.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>