<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:humberto.i.perez.rodriguez@intel.com" title="Humberto Israel Perez Rodriguez <humberto.i.perez.rodriguez@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Humberto Israel Perez Rodriguez</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [BXT/SKL]gem_mmap_gtt/copy* are killiing process, out of memory"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100589">bug 100589</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>FIXED
</td>
<td>---
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [BXT/SKL]gem_mmap_gtt/copy* are killiing process, out of memory"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100589#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [BXT/SKL]gem_mmap_gtt/copy* are killiing process, out of memory"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100589">bug 100589</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:humberto.i.perez.rodriguez@intel.com" title="Humberto Israel Perez Rodriguez <humberto.i.perez.rodriguez@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Humberto Israel Perez Rodriguez</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100589#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> commit b268d9fe0f10544f5f7a1b7015e2b97075e6215d
> Author: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>>
> Date: Wed Apr 5 23:15:14 2017 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
>
> Many sightings report the greater prevalence of allocation failures.
> This is all due to the incorrect use of mapping_gfp_constraint(), so
> remove it in favour of just querying the mapping_gfp_mask() which are
> the exact gfp_t we wanted in the first place.
>
> We still do expect a higher chance of reporting ENOMEM, as that is the
> intention of using __GFP_NORETRY -- to fail rather than oom after having
> reclaimed from our bo caches, and having done a direct|kswapd reclaim
> pass.</span >
Hi Chris Wilson, in the latest commits from drm-tip this patch is not
integrated kernel (4.12)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>