<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BAT][SKL] *ERROR* failed to enable link training"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101144#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BAT][SKL] *ERROR* failed to enable link training"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101144">bug 101144</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com" title="Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Jani Nikula</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Manasi from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101144#c7">comment #7</a>)
<span class="quote">> Actually this one is failing because it is not able to do the
> drm_dp_dpcd_write over AUX is not able to write all the bytes for the
> DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET in intel_dp_set_link_train function. So it never
> starts link training and returns false. So this is a different case than
> link training failure handling.</span >
Well it is *handled* in intel_dp_start_link_train() as if link training failure
happened. The question is, would it have worked if we still plunged on with
channel equalisation regardless of errors?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>