<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BAT][SKL] igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms produces a dmesg-fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101167#c22">Comment # 22</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BAT][SKL] igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms produces a dmesg-fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101167">bug 101167</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:manasi.d.navare@intel.com" title="Manasi <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>"> Manasi</a> <pre>(In reply to Marta Löfstedt from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101167#c18">comment #18</a>) > Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=131731" name="attach_131731" title="dmesg for Manasi suggestion Comment 17">attachment 131731</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=131731&action=edit" title="dmesg for Manasi suggestion Comment 17">[details]</a> > dmesg for Manasi suggestion <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101167#c17">Comment 17</a> This dmesg log shows that we still do a fallback on eDP when link training fails the first time but then it seems to pass at reduced link rate to 162000. Now why don't we see any dp_aux_ch timeouts at this econd attempt of modeset with reduced link rate? So the test passes here with just that first warning right? Isnt that whats expected though? Manasi</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>