<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BAT][SKL] igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms produces a dmesg-fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101167#c26">Comment # 26</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BAT][SKL] igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-dpms produces a dmesg-fail" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101167">bug 101167</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> Marta Löfstedt</a> <pre>Also, remember that when the failing starts at for example igt@kms_busy@basic-flip-default-c the we fail at a very different place compared to the kms_flip fail. However, then we see from IGT: (kms_busy:3941) igt-kms-WARNING: connector 48/eDP-1 has no modes ssame hold true for the: igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic and igt@kms_cursor_legacy fails that is going on on this machine after we have ended up in this state. I discussed with Petri if IGT should skip when we end up in this "no modes" state. But I believe Petri doesn't want the IGT skip to be used for bad states that has occurred in test run-time. Such as the skip by kms_flip. The suggestion would be to implement an IGT abort exit criteria instead of using the IGT skip for different reasons.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>