<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BAT][SKL] *ERROR* failed to enable link training" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101144#c60">Comment # 60</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - [BAT][SKL] *ERROR* failed to enable link training" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101144">bug 101144</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> Marta Löfstedt</a> <pre>(In reply to Manasi from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101144#c59">comment #59</a>) > Here's an update on this bug: > > Found that this specific panel requires a higher panel power cycle delay no > less than 800msecs which is 300ms greater than the eDP min value. With this > value it is able to power cycle the edp panel correctly and can turn it back > on correctly without any aux ch timeouts. > > I tried this fix on Trybot multiple times and consistently got all Success > on 6700hq system: > <a href="https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/26172/">https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/26172/</a> > > I am working on a patch that would add it in the quirk database for this > panel. > > JaniN, Ville let me know what you think about this quirk? > > Manasi A quirk for this panels sound good to me. We have run the test on another eDP SKL laptop and this issue couldn't be reproduced.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>