<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [BAT][BYT] WARN intel_uncore.c:792 __unclaimed_reg_debug (reg 0x18650c)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101516#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [BAT][BYT] WARN intel_uncore.c:792 __unclaimed_reg_debug (reg 0x18650c)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101516">bug 101516</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:krisman@collabora.co.uk" title="krisman@collabora.co.uk">krisman@collabora.co.uk</a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Martin Peres from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101516#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to krisman from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101516#c4">comment #4</a>)
> > (In reply to Martin Peres from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101516#c3">comment #3</a>)
> > > While 101517 indeed got fixed, this one is still very much present.
> >
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > Can you please point to the testcase that is still failing with unclaimed
> > register 650c? I am considering that the other "Unclaimed read from register
> > 0x1f0034" is a different bug.
>
> Sure, it is igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b. You can check
> out the results here:
>
> <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/fi-byt-j1900.html">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/fi-byt-j1900.html</a></span >
Thanks for the information,but if I read the data correctly, after CI_2783, I
don't see references to Unclaimable register 0x650c, only to other registers
around 0x1f0034, which affects other parts of the code
(vlv_program_watermarks), and I believe should be addressed in a different bug.
Either way, I'll dig into that issue now.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>