<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [BXT/SKL]gem_mmap_gtt/copy* are killiing process, out of memory"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100589">bug 100589</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>FIXED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [BXT/SKL]gem_mmap_gtt/copy* are killiing process, out of memory"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100589#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [BXT/SKL]gem_mmap_gtt/copy* are killiing process, out of memory"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100589">bug 100589</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Humberto Israel Perez Rodriguez from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100589#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=100589#c2">comment #2</a>)
> > commit b268d9fe0f10544f5f7a1b7015e2b97075e6215d
> > Author: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>>
> > Date: Wed Apr 5 23:15:14 2017 +0100
> >
> > drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
> >
> > Many sightings report the greater prevalence of allocation failures.
> > This is all due to the incorrect use of mapping_gfp_constraint(), so
> > remove it in favour of just querying the mapping_gfp_mask() which are
> > the exact gfp_t we wanted in the first place.
> >
> > We still do expect a higher chance of reporting ENOMEM, as that is the
> > intention of using __GFP_NORETRY -- to fail rather than oom after having
> > reclaimed from our bo caches, and having done a direct|kswapd reclaim
> > pass.
>
> Hi Chris Wilson, in the latest commits from drm-tip this patch is not
> integrated kernel (4.12)</span >
Pardon?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>