<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com" title="Elizabeth <elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Elizabeth</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [g4x] Desktop hang with drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done "flip_done timed out""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98810">bug 98810</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Severity</td>
<td>normal
</td>
<td>major
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>NEEDINFO
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [g4x] Desktop hang with drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done "flip_done timed out""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98810#c16">Comment # 16</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [g4x] Desktop hang with drm:drm_atomic_helper_commit_cleanup_done "flip_done timed out""
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98810">bug 98810</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com" title="Elizabeth <elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Elizabeth</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Carey Underwood from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=98810#c12">comment #12</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to willma from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=98810#c11">comment #11</a>)
> > I think this report might be a duplicate of <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [skl dp-mst] NULL pointer dereference after vblank/flip_done timed out"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=96781">bug 96781</a>
>
> It's most definitely _related_ to that bug (I compiled a 4.9 with "drm/i915:
> Roll out the helper nonblock tracking" reverted last week, and it removes
> the hangs), but I'd be surprised if it was the same exact issue, at least
> insofar as the issue is more specific than "the atomic config update code
> was merged before it was ready".
>
> As the likelihood of that patch being reverted upstream is negligible,
> separate bugs for each of the ensuing issues will be important for the
> developers to keep track of what is and isn't broken.</span >
Hello Carey,
Is this bug still valid? Still reproducible on latest kernel? Thank you.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>