<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com" title="Elizabeth <elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Elizabeth</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEEDINFO "
   title="NEEDINFO - 12bpc hdmi causes wrong real refresh rate (swapbuffers return time)"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93361">bug 93361</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>NEEDINFO
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEEDINFO "
   title="NEEDINFO - 12bpc hdmi causes wrong real refresh rate (swapbuffers return time)"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93361#c22">Comment # 22</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEEDINFO "
   title="NEEDINFO - 12bpc hdmi causes wrong real refresh rate (swapbuffers return time)"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93361">bug 93361</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com" title="Elizabeth <elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Elizabeth</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>(In reply to Tomeu Vizoso from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93361#c20">comment #20</a>)
<span class="quote">> Kevin, I think this bug should remain open until the i915 driver becomes
> able to get a more accurate clock with 12bpc. This should be possible by
> using clock bending to match the desired refresh rate but this is a change
> that would considerably complicate clock handling in the code and so far
> nobody has started work on this.

> That said, I'm reducing the priority to medium because there's a workaround
> that restores the previous behavior (replacing the edid with
> drm_kms_helper.edid_firmware), and my understanding is that the Highest
> priority is reserved for regressions that don't have a known workaround.</span >
Good afternoon,
Is there any update in this case? Is the accuracy improved in latest updates?
Thank you.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
          <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>