<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [IGT] [KBL/BXT/SKL/HSW/BSW/IVB] kms_setmode@basic test fails"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912#c17">Comment # 17</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [IGT] [KBL/BXT/SKL/HSW/BSW/IVB] kms_setmode@basic test fails"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912">bug 99912</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Marta Löfstedt</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>According to Chris on IRC this test was added to exploit this issue:
<marta_> ickle, when you added the kms_setmode@basic, do you remember if the
new test passed? The shard-snb fail 100% second assert, shard-kbl flip flop
between pass and first assert, shard-hsw flip flop between pass or first or
second assert, mu BDW NUC fail 100% second assert. Also, see bug:
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [IGT] [KBL/BXT/SKL/HSW/BSW/IVB] kms_setmode@basic test fails"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=99912">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912</a>
<ickle> no, the point was to capture that failure
<marta_> mlankhorst suggested to relax the requirements, but if this is an
actual failure we need to fix it.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>