<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [IGT][BDW] kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-*draw* has inconsistent results"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623#c20">Comment # 20</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [IGT][BDW] kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-*draw* has inconsistent results"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623">bug 101623</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Marta Löfstedt</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Elizabeth from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101623#c19">comment #19</a>)
<span class="quote">> I think this bug may be a dup of <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [igt]kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend fails"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=100020">bug 100020</a>, because the "FBC disabled".</span >
Well, it could be related, but as I wrote in #c15, the "FBC disabled" issue is
no longer reproducible. Instead I hit the WARN_ON(fbc->active). Which is
handled in <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [BAT] igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic WARN_ON(fbc->active)"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=102473">BUG 102473</a>. So, are you claiming that you can still reproduce the
"FBC disabled" issue in <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [igt]kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend fails"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=100020">BUG 100020</a> or are you claiming that you now hit the
WARN_ON(fbc->active)?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>