<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI] rtcwake failed with 256" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102261#c15">Comment # 15</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI] rtcwake failed with 256" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102261">bug 102261</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> Marta Löfstedt</a> <pre>(In reply to Marta Löfstedt from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=102261#c8">comment #8</a>) > After 4.14.0-rc1 KBL-shards either have the rtcwake failed with 256 or > incompletes. > > Some incomplete runs with pstore: > > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3102/shard-kbl4/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3102/shard-kbl4/</a> > igt@<a href="mailto:gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html">gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html</a> > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3104/shard-kbl2/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3104/shard-kbl2/</a> > igt@<a href="mailto:gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html">gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html</a> > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3108/shard-kbl5/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3108/shard-kbl5/</a> > igt@<a href="mailto:gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html">gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html</a> > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3109/shard-kbl5/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3109/shard-kbl5/</a> > igt@<a href="mailto:gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html">gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html</a> > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3112/shard-kbl4/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3112/shard-kbl4/</a> > igt@<a href="mailto:gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html">gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html</a> > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3116/shard-kbl5/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3116/shard-kbl5/</a> > igt@<a href="mailto:gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html">gem_exec_suspend@basic-S4.html</a> > > The backtraces are not identical, but they all have: > "e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 eno1: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:" To clarify here is a run where don't get incomplete but hit the failure described in the first entry for this bug: <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3107/shard-kbl2/igt@drv_suspend@debugfs-reader-hibernate.html">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_3107/shard-kbl2/igt@drv_suspend@debugfs-reader-hibernate.html</a> However, I have now discussed with Imre and according to him this bug requires the association with the backtrace that is included in the kernel bugzilla bug and/or? the string "[ 680.783120] fstrim D 0 1612 1611 0x00000004" Also, the links from the original entry in this bug is dead.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>