<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Inverted touchpad coasting possibly caused by desktop effects" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103497#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Inverted touchpad coasting possibly caused by desktop effects" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103497">bug 103497</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:gabriele.mzt@gmail.com" title="Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>"> Gabriele Mazzotta</a> <pre>(In reply to Jani Nikula from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103497#c5">comment #5</a>) > Huh, isn't the typical alt mode basically the same mode with different > vrefresh? Like in this case. Aren't we now throwing away the alt mode > altogether with this patch? > > Gabriele, *without* any patches applied, can you see a difference between > using the 60 vs. 48 Hz refresh rate modes? I can't notice any difference when I change the refresh rate. Using some tools that measure the refresh rate of the screen I found that 4.14-rc6 is stuck at 48Hz, no matter what value I set for the refresh rate, while 4.13 and 4.14-rc8+path are stuck at 60Hz.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>