<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Marta Löfstedt</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][IGT] [SNB/IVB] kms_fbcon_fbt: Failed assertion: feature->wait_until_enabled(drm.fd)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101718">bug 101718</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEEDINFO
</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][IGT] [SNB/IVB] kms_fbcon_fbt: Failed assertion: feature->wait_until_enabled(drm.fd)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101718#c32">Comment # 32</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][IGT] [SNB/IVB] kms_fbcon_fbt: Failed assertion: feature->wait_until_enabled(drm.fd)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101718">bug 101718</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:marta.lofstedt@intel.com" title="Marta Löfstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Marta Löfstedt</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to krisman from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101718#c31">comment #31</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Marta Löfstedt from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=101718#c30">comment #30</a>)
> > Also,
> > <a href="https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7096/shard-snb4/">https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_7096/shard-snb4/</a>
> > igt@<a href="mailto:kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend.html">kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend.html</a>
>
> Here we go. The patch output was:
>
> (kms_fbcon_fbt:7815) DEBUG: FBC status: FBC disabled: not enough stolen
> memory
>
> So, we need someone to verify if the BIOS supports increasing the stolen
> memory on SNB4.
>
> Several months ago, I submitted a patch to skip tests on cases like this,
> but it was rejected on the argument that the user should know better and
> increase the memory. So, either the BIOS supports it for these machines, or
> we will have a good point on reviving that patch.
>
> Setting to NEEDINFO until someone at Intel can verify the BIOS.</span >
krisman, SNB solen memory is handled in <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI] igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@*fbc* - spurious skips - !fbc_not_enough_stolen()"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=103516">bug 103516</a>.
I believe Ville has a patch for that, but I don't know what that is happening
to it.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>