<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI] igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctxn - incomplete - gem_ppgtt: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x14204d2(GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL|__GFP_RECLAIMABLE), nodemask=(null)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104011#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI] igt@gem_ppgtt@blt-vs-render-ctxn - incomplete - gem_ppgtt: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x14204d2(GFP_HIGHUSER|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL|__GFP_RECLAIMABLE), nodemask=(null)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104011">bug 104011</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=104011#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> What is not so happy is the
>
> <4>[ 193.388010] hpet1: lost 7161 rtc interrupts
>
> A dead timer. That would explain why we never were able to retire requests
> and so leaked everything, and everything remained marked as busy.</span >
No, it doesn't. If we thought everything was still active, we would not have
filled swap (only inactive bo can be swapped). Which brings us back to a bo
leak, but whose?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>