<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com" title="Elizabeth <elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Elizabeth</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [pnv] Warnings after resume in i915 (misbehaving bios?)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65497">bug 65497</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>REOPENED
</td>
<td>NEEDINFO
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [pnv] Warnings after resume in i915 (misbehaving bios?)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65497#c34">Comment # 34</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - [pnv] Warnings after resume in i915 (misbehaving bios?)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65497">bug 65497</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com" title="Elizabeth <elizabethx.de.la.torre.mena@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Elizabeth</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Elizabeth from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=65497#c33">comment #33</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Zoltán Böszörményi from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=65497#c30">comment #30</a>)
> > The previous test was wrong, the patch to increase the panel power on
> > timeout from 1 second to 2 seconds was still applied accidentally.
> Hello Zoltan,
> Any news with the latest kernels/drm-tip?
> Thank you.</span >
Hello Zoltan, this bug seems to be about two issues, first the timeout, that as
per <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=65497#c5">comment #5</a> to #13 points to BIOS. And as it seems in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=65497#c30">comment #30</a> the issue
may exist while BIOS keep the same. So this would be taken as a BIOS problem
instead of kernel, at least while proved otherwise.
And the second, the warns messages. Do this messages keep constant with latest
kernel? As we don't have a way to reproduce, if we don't get feedback from
reporters, it is assumed to be fixed or non-reproducible upstream. Hopefully
the problem will be fixed already over 4.14 and up. Can you confirm? Thank you.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>