<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Inverted touchpad coasting possibly caused by desktop effects" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103497#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Inverted touchpad coasting possibly caused by desktop effects" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103497">bug 103497</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jani.nikula@intel.com" title="Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>"> Jani Nikula</a> <pre>Citing dc911f5bd8aa ("drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available."), "Some fixed resolution panels actually support more than one mode, with the only thing different being the refresh rate." Now, the patch proposed in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103497#c3">comment #3</a> (and never submitted to the intel-gfx mailing list, btw) requires the same refresh rate in the alt mode. This seems like defeating the whole purpose of the original commit. What's the point? Without an explanation, I'd rather merge a revert of the original commit.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>