<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [BAT][CI][GLK only] igt@* - incomplete - timeout/system hang"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103359#c83">Comment # 83</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [BAT][CI][GLK only] igt@* - incomplete - timeout/system hang"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103359">bug 103359</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:imre.deak@intel.com" title="Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Imre Deak</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Marta Löfstedt from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103359#c79">comment #79</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Imre Deak from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103359#c76">comment #76</a>)
> > Marta, is this bug only about the failures with the
> >
> > r8169 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0: rtl_phy_reset_cond == 1
> >
> > error? In that case I would suggest closing this as NOTOURBUG. Until the
> > r8169 fix the network adapter bug, we could switch to using another adapter.
>
> No, this bug is for generic GLK incompletes that don't have any proven
> reason for. We have a hypothesis that some of the instances are related to
> the r8169 suspect logs, but we have not proven that. I.e. this bug will
> remain open.</span >
(In reply to Marta Löfstedt from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103359#c81">comment #81</a>)
<span class="quote">>
> Also, Imre when we get real GLK machines, this and other GLKB-shards related
> bugs, will be archived.</span >
There is pretty good evidence what is the problem and we could act on them now,
instead of just waiting for those new machines to arrive.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>