<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [BAT][GDG] igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic-small-bo-tiledx - fail - Failed assertion: memcmp(ptr , tiled_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575#c12">Comment # 12</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [BAT][GDG] igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic-small-bo-tiledx - fail - Failed assertion: memcmp(ptr , tiled_pattern, PAGE_SIZE) == 0" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575">bug 102575</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>That basically depends on whether the failure pattern is universal (any gtt write/read) like on gdg or specific to this test. At the present time, it is quite clear that we have a number of errata with gdg's CPU that we are not taking into account (that being adding noclflush fixed quite a few issues by itself is telling). I don't think it is very likely that gm45 with a Core2 is going to be exactly the same issues as a Pentium4.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>