<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - [GLK] no signal after switch resolution from 1080p@23.98" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105887#c75">Comment # 75</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - [GLK] no signal after switch resolution from 1080p@23.98" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105887">bug 105887</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:clinton.a.taylor@intel.com" title="Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>"> Clinton Taylor</a> <pre>(In reply to <a href="mailto:shashank.sharma@intel.com">shashank.sharma@intel.com</a> from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105887#c74">comment #74</a>) > Well, I could not relate that, as there are few parallel thread. Also I > don't understand why we need a HDMI 2.0 retimer on GLK as it already has a > HDMI 2.0 native controller, unless someone needs 2 or 3 HDMI 2.0 sources > coming out of GLK NUC, and NUC was short of it, and some platform team > decided to use some Paradetech dongle to convert DP 1.2 -> HDMI 2.0. > The ITE66317 retimer implementation does seem to be causing the Linux driver some difficulty. Based on what I have seen so far, the Linux driver doesn't wait long enough during mode changes for the retimer to sync correctly to the new faster clock.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>