<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - [GLK] no signal after switch resolution from 1080p@23.98" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105887#c90">Comment # 90</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - [GLK] no signal after switch resolution from 1080p@23.98" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105887">bug 105887</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:clinton.a.taylor@intel.com" title="Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>"> Clinton Taylor</a> <pre>(In reply to user.forums from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105887#c84">comment #84</a>) > (In reply to user.forums from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105887#c83">comment #83</a>) > > (In reply to Clinton Taylor from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=105887#c82">comment #82</a>) > > > It will probably apply to 4.17. It's not much different than the 50ms wait > > > you were using before. The patch just detects a GLK NUC before waiting 42ms. > > > > > > I would like some tests to make sure a 42ms delay is enough. I probably ran > > > 200 cycles in testing, but would really like more to confirm the workaround. > > > > The good news is your patch applies to 4.17. The bad news is it doesn't work > > here going from a NUC7PJYH -> Sony surround receiver -> Panasonic TV. > Could you run lspci -vvn -s00:02.0 from a console prompt and post the results? Thanks, Clint</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>