<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI] igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-* - dmesg-warn - WARN_ON_ONCE((1) && !(preempt_count() != 0))" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106977#c1">Comment # 1</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [CI] igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-* - dmesg-warn - WARN_ON_ONCE((1) && !(preempt_count() != 0))" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106977">bug 106977</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> Chris Wilson</a> <pre>So that is wait_for_atomic() complaining about the _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK() failing, i..e that we used wait_for_atomic() from an ordinary process context. So normally the tasklet would be called from softirq context but in this case, it's a call by intel_engine_is_idle() doing the direct check for fast idling. Ok, seems easy to fix...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>