<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span> changed
<a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI] igt@* - dmesg-warn/fail - WARN_ON(dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl(dev_priv, (((const i915_reg_t){ .reg = (0x6f900) })), true) & (1<<31))"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106948">bug 106948</a>
<br>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
<tr>
<th>What</th>
<th>Removed</th>
<th>Added</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
<td>NEW
</td>
<td>RESOLVED
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
<td>---
</td>
<td>FIXED
</td>
</tr></table>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI] igt@* - dmesg-warn/fail - WARN_ON(dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl(dev_priv, (((const i915_reg_t){ .reg = (0x6f900) })), true) & (1<<31))"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106948#c13">Comment # 13</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [CI] igt@* - dmesg-warn/fail - WARN_ON(dev_priv->uncore.funcs.mmio_readl(dev_priv, (((const i915_reg_t){ .reg = (0x6f900) })), true) & (1<<31))"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106948">bug 106948</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Dhinakaran Pandiyan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106948#c12">comment #12</a>)
<span class="quote">> Do(In reply to Dhinakaran Pandiyan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106948#c11">comment #11</a>)
> > (In reply to Martin Peres from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106948#c10">comment #10</a>)
> > > (In reply to Dhinakaran Pandiyan from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=106948#c8">comment #8</a>)
> > > > With the patch?
> > >
> > > Actually, why don't you just push it? I mean, we have a limitation in our CI
> > > system, and testing will not come until Monday at least.
> > >
> > > Worst case scenario, PSR is still broken after. Best case scenario, it works
> > > after. To me, merging this trivial patch makes sense.
> >
> > Yeah, I was going to push it but preferred to have a confirmation if it was
> > easy to get.
>
> Done.
> 98fa2aecb509 drm/i915/psr: Fix warning in intel_psr_activate()</span >
Wonderful, thanks DK for the fast turnaround!
I'm resolving the bug, and will close it when I can verify that this indeed
fixed it :)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>