<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - SSEU status is all 0 on BXT"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103484#c22">Comment # 22</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - SSEU status is all 0 on BXT"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103484">bug 103484</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com" title="Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>"> <span class="fn">Lionel Landwerlin</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Lionel Landwerlin from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=103484#c21">comment #21</a>)
<span class="quote">> Chris suggests we move the igt test as a selftest in i915 for 3 reasons :
>
> 1. ack registers are priveleged so must be read from kernel
> 2. need to read the value from command streamer because we need HW awake + a
> context scheduled (ack register values reflect the programmed value in
> context image)
> 3. there is some ongoing work to change powergating configuration
> dynamically and that will likely rely on heuristic in i915, which means
> userspace can probably only guess the value in the ack registers</span >
I should add that the selftest should only verify the initial value programmed
is correct.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>