<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_eio@reset-stress - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed < 250e6"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107500#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][SHARDS] igt@gem_eio@reset-stress - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed < 250e6"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107500">bug 107500</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk" title="Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>"> <span class="fn">Chris Wilson</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>A long shot (one that I've tried earlier with no success) was
commit a6476ebd4350d51146ef0492b4b06bc0d31e8827
Author: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>>
Date: Mon Aug 6 15:56:47 2018 +0100
drm/i915: Stop dropping irq around resets
A long time ago, we were afraid of handling interrupts and signaling
waiters during a reset, worrying that the confusion in request handling
would interfere with our attempts to process the reset in an orderly
fashion. Since then, we have isolated our irq-driven request handling by
virtue of the engine->timeline.lock and control of kthreads where
required, eliminating the danger of concurrently processing interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <<a href="mailto:mika.kuoppala@intel.com">mika.kuoppala@intel.com</a>>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <<a href="mailto:mika.kuoppala@intel.com">mika.kuoppala@intel.com</a>>
Link:
<a href="https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180806145647.13131-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180806145647.13131-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>
but at least that confirms that it's not a shadow caused by the disabling of
irq across reset. Fresh ideas required.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>