<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@perf_pmu@* - incomplete - No useful logs"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107816#c4">Comment # 4</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@perf_pmu@* - incomplete - No useful logs"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107816">bug 107816</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:martin.peres@free.fr" title="Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>"> <span class="fn">Martin Peres</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Chris Wilson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=107816#c1">comment #1</a>)
<span class="quote">> Our shard-snb have a random machine death; the only clue being a rare "GT
> thread status wait_timed out" (and that is a known associate of HW death).
> So at the moment, an unexplainable snb death should be taken with a pinch of
> salt as it's likely to be the same. (Bug triaging by fixes, if we only knew
> how to fix it.)</span >
Thanks for the info. These SNB have always acted up. No idea if windows was
better though.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>